The Geek blog

Songbird Preview Released

with 21 comments

Earlier today the guys at songbird released 0.1 alpha preview of songbird, the firsthint at what is hopefully gonig to be a great new music player. Its more of a proof of concept model rather than a full program, just to prove to the many doubters that songbird does exist. Its no-where near a finish produce, so you cant do any strict comparisons yet, but so far its looking good, and has a lot of potentional.

The first thing that jumps out at me is the GUI, similar to itunes, thats a good thing in my book, but black, suits my black ipod nano very nicely. Well designed , well placed buttons,and has all the usual media player buttons and functions, one thing i noticed missing was an equilizer, not sure if i couldnt find it, or if it was just not included in this preview. Most certainly the best looking media player in my opinion. It also comes with a second red skin:

And a miniplayer:

Being built on the firefox engine means that instantly Songbird has THE best builtin webbrowser, of any media player i have used, very fast and responsive, just like firefox. It will open pretty much any webpage, i havnt had any problems with it yet.

One of the best features i have found so far is that on any webpage with media items such as .mp3’s or .mpeg files, songbird opens a small menu below the page showing all availbe media on the page, and gives the option to play or download them all or individually, i havnt tried this out very much yet, but its perfect for saving videos embeded in webpages and mp3s from bands webpages with just a couple clicks:

Songbird also handles podcasts very well, allowing you to bookmark feeds from within the player and then have songbird periodly check and download them. Its a very web2.0 browser, and so already works with many web2.0 music services already. As more come along the extension system, much like firefox will allow songbird to be very customisable and extendable.

The extenions are also the most likely way that songbird will connect to your ipod, due to legal implications and problems, which have already been slowing songbird down, i dont think that apple will let the makers include ipod transefers and functionality but there is nothing to stop a third party creating an extension to do just that.

Another thing that i noticed without really meaning to is the excellent way songbird handles online music, i played the 70mb mp3 i posted about yesterday through songbird and was able to jump to anyway where in the song and within less than a second it was playing from that part of the song, i dont know this has been included in any other media players but i was very impressed with the smoothness of it, it didnt seem like i was streaming it from the net at all.

Being an Alpha release, Songbird 0.1 does have its fair share of bugs, we were warned it would be slow, bloated and crashy. And they met all those things, when you drag the window around it doesnt refresh quite quick enoguh, it takes a good 10 seconds to open from cold, and the first time i tried the search music function it crashed straight away, i’ve had about 15 crashes so far today whilst testing out all the different things and had to re-install it once as well. But i didnt expect it to be any different, most pre-release software these days that is made publicly availbe is a beta, pretty much ready for the public and been in development for ages. This is a real life alpha and you have to take it with a pinch of salt, its going to crash and burn, but this release is not ment to be used for everyday music playing, its to show the web what it might be like, and to get feedback on what they have so far.

I’m going to keep watching songbird as it progresses and hopefully it will take over from iTunes as my general music player in the summer when the Beta is scheduled for.

Unfortunatly the website – has been hit by the digg effect, and it struggling to keep up, so for a couple hours you may not be able to get on it, but it is a very good looking website. The graphic designers have been working hard on songbird, and it shows, the graphics on the site, and built into the player make it look very professional, and in this modern world, good looking programs do sell, i know there are a lot of hardcore geeks, often linux fans, who dont really care for the graphics, but there are tons more people who would choose a tasteful gui instead, and prolly wouldnt flame it so much.

I’ve been watching the songbirdnest blog since before xmas 2005, and the amount of flame and abusive comments they have had, many you can see on the digg story at the moment, jsut boggles the mind. Putting down a piece of software just because it looks nice (therefore uses a couple more mbs or RAM) is just petty.

I’ve been using Songbird for a good few hours now, and for playing music its jsut as good as everyother media player, it does everything that you’d expect, except the lack of equlizer at the moment. The only other serious thing i have noticed is that when importing my music, its all in .AAC and songbird does not see any of the artist or album labels that itunes does, im not sure if this is something itunes has done or an error in songbird, but i’ll look into.

You can download high-res screenshots from my Songbird flickr set.

Songbirdnest.comDigg storyProxy fix

Download (8mb) Mirror 1Mirror 2

Tags: , ,


Written by Atariboy

February 8, 2006 at 2:24 pm

Posted in Digg, Geeky, Software, Songbird, Web

21 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. “I’ve been watching the songbirdnest blog since before xmas 2005, and the amount of flame and abusive comments they have had, many you can see on the digg story at the moment, jsut boggles the mind. Putting down a piece of software just because it looks nice (therefore uses a couple more mbs or RAM) is just petty.”

    Totally, totally agree. people bemoaning the fact that it crashes or wont run, saying it looks like iTunes and so on just dont get it. its not even really an beta release, its a ‘proof of concept’. basically they’ve cobbled together the major features but (by the looks of things) not added anything special yet, obviously at this stage its going to crash, obviously its going to be slow.

    The point those people are missing is that its Open source, thus expandable and not rigid like iTunes. It may resemble it (and a few other things) but under the hood its firefox, tweeked by some VERY smart coders.

    personally I think this’ll be a winner when it alpha’s.


    February 8, 2006 at 3:54 pm

  2. Thanks so much for digging my story and using my site for the mirror, I feel so privilaged :) Its great software really impressed with it (for a 0.1.0 release) Cya around.

    – Tom |

    Tom Parker

    February 8, 2006 at 4:13 pm

  3. First impressions tend to last… So imho it’s not always a very good option to release alpha software, just because it’s buggy and crashy and people don’t look at wether it’s alpha, beta or final, they seem to expect a perfectly working piece of software…

    Asside from that, I doubt that I’ll like Songbird, not because it would look like iTunes (which I don’t like either), just because I like the more simplistic approuch when it comes to GUI’s. Here I probably differ from you Atariboy.
    I’ll probably be checking out Songbird in some later stage, but for the time being I’ll stick with Winamp for my music (it sucks for video, long live VLC and mPlayer). For Winamp I’ll either use some classic skin or the default modern skin, just as long as it feels like a music player and not like a videogame or movie doodle…
    And I don’t really like a fullscreen interface for a musicplayer, which iTunes and Songbird have (by default). A video is meant to be full screen, but for music I prefer a smaller window that I can pop up on the side of my screen.


    February 8, 2006 at 5:03 pm

  4. Software choice always comes down to preference in the end, if you dont like this style of media player then you are not going to use it!

    But you shouldnt try and force your opinions on everyone (not aiming this at you zhooibaal, its all the flamers on, they just need to be told!)

    For people that use and like itunes, songbird will provide an opensource alternative which gives much more freedom and customisability than itunes.


    February 8, 2006 at 5:41 pm

  5. Ah. Nice, very nice! I’ve been waiting for a first release of Songbird and now I’m really looking forward to a more stable and feature rich version! I really like iTunes but an opensource option is really welcome!


    February 8, 2006 at 6:42 pm

  6. Songbird thoughts

    A non-organized list of things I found interesting while playing with Songbird today, several hours after public release. To preface this, I’m not writing a full “review” because there isn’t a lot to review yet (you can find a …

    February 8, 2006 at 7:00 pm

  7. Very nice — I wish it wasn’t so buggy though. Looking forward to a portable version (see my blog and


    February 8, 2006 at 7:59 pm

  8. Does it take a long time to load for you guys? Or is it just me?


    February 8, 2006 at 10:23 pm

  9. […] Also, songbird has finally released a preview release! I’ve been waiting for this for quite some time… and it seems that their server is down. Fortunately, some kind soul has offered a mirror at his website. Also, there’s an interesting review you can read, if you don’t want to download it — it’s got plenty of screenshots. […]

  10. It does take a longtime to load from cold for me too


    February 9, 2006 at 12:49 am

  11. […] Why am I going to run an uglier, slower, less feature rich media player that takes up four times as much of my system’s precious resources? Ask Paul or AtariBoy who have also reviewed it. […]

  12. […] Here is another great review of songbird that goes into a little more detail about the UI and includes screenshots. ARS technica also has a great article about Songbird here. […]

  13. Nice write-up.


    February 10, 2006 at 4:37 am

  14. Yes it does quite suit the new black iPods – does it allow you to sync up to various music players then? iPod, Zen and so on?


    February 11, 2006 at 11:16 pm

  15. I couldn’t agree more!


    February 15, 2006 at 1:11 am

  16. i love the veronics!


    March 2, 2006 at 11:26 pm

  17. hi 2 all.
    hello world! It is nice site. Keep working!
    best regards
    i found you here ^^


    January 26, 2007 at 3:21 pm

  18. I enjoy your site very much! THANK YOUa


    May 31, 2007 at 8:47 pm

  19. Hi :)


    September 7, 2007 at 7:59 pm

  20. I haven’t been up to much today. Such is life. Pretty much nothing seems important. What can I say? Not much on my mind these days.


    November 24, 2007 at 12:37 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: